Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Kyle Edmund vs Evgeny Donskoy Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Edmund vs Donskoy analysis and find out who is favored!
Kyle Edmund vs Evgeny Donskoy Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Edmund 2 - 0 Donskoy
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Edmund has won 52.27% of points on his second serve, while Donskoy has won 52.77%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Edmund, in recent form, has won 52.11% of his opponent's second serve points, while Donskoy has won 46.63%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.72% and 29.44% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Edmund has saved 61.27% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Donskoy has saved 59.48% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Edmund has won 61.54% of matches played (W/L 24/ 15), with Donskoy winning 45.28% (W/L 24/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Edmund has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 69% (W/L 55/ 25), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 34% (W/L 13/ 25). Donskoy has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 253/ 173), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 37% (W/L 16/ 27).
- Player level: In the last year, Edmund has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 77.27% of matches (W/L 17/ 5), where as Donskoy has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 36.67% of matches (W/L 11/ 19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Edmund winning 2 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Edmund winning 4 and Donskoy winning 1. The last match between Edmund and Donskoy was at the BNP Paribas Masters - Paris, 31-10-2017, First, I.hard with Kyle Edmund getting the victory 5-7 7-6(7) 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:58:12.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Edmund and Donskoy have played a deciding set 1 times, with Edmund winning 1 times and Donskoy 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Edmund winning 2, and Donskoy 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Edmund has played against opponents with an average rank of 311.26 while Donskoy has played against players with an average rank of 202.79.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Edmund has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Donskoy has won 45% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Edmund has converted 39.8% of breakpoint opportunities, and Donskoy has converted 36.07% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
496
Rank
14
High
29
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
425
Rank
65
High
34
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
Form
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
61% (334-214)
Career Total W/L
55% (536-445)
61% (17-11)
YTD W/L
45% (10-12)
$3,623,010
Career Prize Money
$1,427,945
2
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Kyle Edmund | Evgeny Donskoy |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 1 |
| Games Won | 31 | 26 |
| Aces (Total) | 18 | 14 |
| DFs (Total) | 9 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:58:12 | 1:58:12 |
| 1st Serve % | 50% (92/183) | 52% (88/169) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 83% (76/92) | 72% (63/88) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 51% (46/91) | 54% (44/81) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 60% (6/10) | 56% (5/9) |
| Return Points W% | 37% (62/169) | 33% (61/183) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5-7 7-6(7) 6-3 |
Stats 
Kyle Edmund
Player
Evgeny Donskoy
53%
(
57 of
107)
1st Serve %
50%
(
50 of
100)
10
Aces
12
6
Double Faults
2
86%
(
49 of
57)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
36 of
50)
44%
(
22 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
34%
(
36 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
35 of
100)
106
Total Points Won
101
|
||||
| 7-6(2) 6-4 |
Stats
Kyle Edmund
Player
Evgeny Donskoy
46%
(
35 of
76)
1st Serve %
55%
(
38 of
69)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
59%
(
24 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
25 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
78
Total Points Won
67
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Kyle Edmund | Evgeny Donskoy |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 61% (17/11) | 45% (10/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 59% (40/28) | 45% (23/28) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (348/307) | 49% (232/240) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 45% (10/12) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 44% (4/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 68% (13/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.4 | 0.3 |
| Aces Total | 127 | 71 |
| DFs per game | 0.27 | 0.18 |
| DFs Total | 87 | 42 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:47:22 | 1:35:36 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 348 | 226.32 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (1177/2015) | 59% (867/1481) |
| 1st Serve W% | 72% (852/1177) | 71% (618/867) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (438/838) | 53% (324/614) |
| BPs Won% Total | 40% (80/201) | 36% (44/122) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (787/2034) | 36% (533/1481) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 41% (7/10) | 39% (7/11) |
| Futures W/L | 91% (10/1) | 75% (3/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 61% (17/28) | 43% (9/21) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 27% (3/11) | 50% (3/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (6/12) | 50% (4/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 74% (19/14) | 73% (11/8) |
| 1st set W, L | 26% (19/5) | 27% (11/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (9/3) | 18% (11/2) |
Kyle Edmund Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF | 6-7(4) 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kyle Edmund
Player
Daniel Michalski
45%
(
35 of
77)
1st Serve %
57%
(
45 of
79)
4
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
6
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
34 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
41 of
79)
84
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Arthur Gea
Player
Kyle Edmund
59%
(
58 of
98)
1st Serve %
61%
(
52 of
85)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
9
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
43%
(
42 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
97
Total Points Won
86
|
5-7 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kyle Edmund
Player
Keenan Mayo
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
8
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gerald Melzer
Player
Kyle Edmund
53%
(
28 of
53)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gerald Melzer
Player
Kyle Edmund
57%
(
54 of
95)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
83)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
43%
(
41 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
42 of
83)
96
Total Points Won
82
|
2-6 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kyle Edmund
Player
Johannes Ingildsen
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Giovanni Fonio
Player
Kyle Edmund
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
67%
(
43 of
64)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kyle Edmund
Player
Gerald Melzer
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
47%
(
26 of
55)
7
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
3
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marko Topo
Player
Kyle Edmund
70%
(
55 of
79)
1st Serve %
53%
(
36 of
68)
9
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
4
80%
(
44 of
55)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
31 of
36)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
28%
(
22 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
20 of
68)
77
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
view more
Evgeny Donskoy Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Illya Marchenko
Player
Evgeny Donskoy
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve %
73%
(
69 of
94)
9
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
43 of
69)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
20 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
36 of
94)
91
Total Points Won
78
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Evgeny Donskoy
Player
Omar Jasika
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve %
81%
(
58 of
72)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
80%
(
16 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
15 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
22 of
72)
76
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rigele Te
Player
Evgeny Donskoy
59%
(
70 of
118)
1st Serve %
57%
(
64 of
112)
13
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
1
73%
(
51 of
70)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
43 of
64)
58%
(
28 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
39 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
39 of
112)
118
Total Points Won
112
|
6-7(7) 7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hiroki Moriya
Player
Evgeny Donskoy
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
47%
(
26 of
55)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Evgeny Donskoy
Player
Remy Bertola
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
5
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
24 of
32)
70%
(
19 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
29%
(
19 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Remy Bertola
Player
Evgeny Donskoy
49%
(
33 of
67)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
4
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
1
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
24 of
31)
65%
(
22 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
27%
(
18 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
21 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Karan Singh
Player
Evgeny Donskoy
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Evgeny Donskoy
Player
Florent Bax
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve %
72%
(
28 of
39)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
6 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
47
Total Points Won
24
|
6-2 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Evgeny Donskoy
Player
Kabir Hans
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve %
67%
(
43 of
64)
6
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
96%
(
22 of
23)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
65
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Evgeny Donskoy
Player
Shivank Bhatnagar
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
52%
(
17 of
33)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
52
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Edmund Vs Donskoy Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
